Long-term platelet priming after glycoprotein VI stimulation in comparison to Protease- Activating Receptor (PAR) stimulation

12Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Platelets can respond to multiple antagonists and agonists, implying that their activation state is a consequence of past exposure to these substances. While platelets are often considered as one-time responsive cells, they likely can respond to sequential application of inhibitors and stimuli. We hypothesized that the ability of platelets to sequentially respond depends on the time and type of repeated agonist application. The present proof-of-concept data show that iloprost (cAMP elevation), tirofiban (integrin αIIbβ3 blocker) and Syk kinase inhibition subacutely modulated platelet aggregation, i.e. halted this process even when applied after agonist. In comparison to thrombin-activated receptor (PAR) stimulation, glycoprotein VI (GPVI) stimulation was less sensitive to time-dependent blockage of aggregation, with Syk inhibition as an exception. Furthermore, cytosolic Ca2+ measurements indicated that, when compared to PAR, prior GPVI stimulation induced a more persistent, priming activation state of platelets that influenced the response to a next agent. Overall, these data point to an unexpected priming memory of activated platelets in subacutely responding to another inhibitor or stimulus, with a higher versatility and faster offset after PAR stimulation than after GPVI stimulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zou, J., Wu, J., Roest, M., & Heemskerk, J. W. M. (2021). Long-term platelet priming after glycoprotein VI stimulation in comparison to Protease- Activating Receptor (PAR) stimulation. PLoS ONE, 16(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247425

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free