Comparison of the prevalence of osteoporosis in people with spinal cord injury according to bone mineral density reference values for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a retrospective, cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex cause of rapid low bone mass that easily predisposes the affected individuals to osteoporosis-induced fractures. Several studies have investigated osteoporosis pathophysiology in SCI; however, those associated with its diagnosis in SCI are limited. Additionally, errors in osteoporosis diagnosis and its prevalence vary based on the bone mineral density (BMD) reference values (BMDRV), and no studies have reported BMDRV application for osteoporosis diagnosis in individuals with SCI. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prevalence of osteoporosis among Korean adults aged ≥ 50 years with SCI according to BMDRV for diagnosing osteoporosis. Methods: Overall, 855 patients with SCI who underwent BMD tests of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip at the National Rehabilitation Center (NRC) in Korea between 2010 and 2020 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in patients with SCI by comparing the differences in prevalence, diagnostic consistency, and risk factors according to the region-based BMDRV of the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) manufacturer and international BMDRV based on the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) data of females aged 20–29 years. Results: The prevalence of osteoporosis according to the T-score provided by a single reference population of the NHANES III (TNHA) (PONHA) (males: 26.69%; females: 69.35%) was significantly higher in females and males than that according to the T-scores provided by the DXA manufacturer (TDXA) (PODXA) (males: 15.32%; females: 43.15%). The lumbar spine and femoral neck were major osteoporosis diagnosis sites for the PODXA and PONHA, respectively. Risk factors for osteoporosis differed based on the probability of osteoporosis (also known as the OZ ratio) according to the BMD criteria; however, the risk factors were similar according to old age, female sex, low body mass index (BMI), and long SCI period. No significant relationship was noted between the different SCI-related clinical factors (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The osteoporosis diagnostic site and prevalence in SCI differed according to the regional-based TDXA and international standards of the TNHA. Therefore, further studies on BMDRV are warranted to establish accurate diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis prevention in patients with SCI.