A quadrilemma for theories of consciousness

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that no theory of consciousness can simultaneously respect four initially plausible metaphysical claims - namely 'first-person realism', 'non-solipsism', 'non-fragmentation', and 'one world' - but that any three of the four claims are mutually consistent. So, theories of consciousness face a 'quadrilemma'. Since it will be hard to achieve a consensus on which of the four claims to retain and which to give up, we arrive at a landscape of competing theories, all of which have pros and cons. I will briefly indicate which kinds of theories correspond to the four horns of the quadrilemma.