Abstract
Social psychology findings have fared poorly in multi-site replication attempts. This article considers and evaluates multiple factors that may contribute to such failures, other than the crisis assumption that most of the field's published research is so badly flawed that it should be dismissed wholesale. Low engagement by participants may reduce replicability of some findings (while not affecting certain others). Incentives differ between original researchers and replicators. If multi-site replications are indeed biased toward failure, this may have a damaging effect on the field's ability to build correct theories.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Tice, D. M. (2023, April 11). Multi-Site Replications in Social Psychology: Reflections, Implications, and Future Directions. Spanish Journal of Psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.