Novel Non-Invasive Index for Prediction of Responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using High-Resolution Magnetocardiography

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Approximately one-third of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether the left ventricular (LV) conduction pattern on magnetocardiography (MCG) can predict CRT responders. Methods and Results: This retrospective study enrolled 56 patients with advanced HF (mean [±SD] LV ejection fraction [LVEF] 23±8%; QRS duration 145±19ms) and MCG recorded before CRT. MCG-QRS current arrow maps were classified as multidirectional (MDC; n=28) or unidirectional (UDC; n=28) conduction based on a change of either ≥35° or <35°, respectively, in the direction of the maximal current arrow after the QRS peak. Baseline New York Heart Association functional class and LVEF were comparable between the 2 groups, but QRS duration was longer and the presence of complete left bundle branch block and LV dyssynchrony was higher in the UDC than MDC group. Six months after CRT, 30 patients were defined as responders, with significantly more in the UDC than MDC group (89% vs. 14%, respectively; P<0.001). Over a 5-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that adverse cardiac events (death or implantation of an LV assist device) were less frequently observed in the UDC than MDC group (6/28 vs. 15/28, respectively; P=0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that UDC on MCG was the most significant predictor of CRT response (odds ratio 69.8; 95% confidence interval 13.14–669.32; P<0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative non-invasive MCG may predict the CRT response and long-term outcome after CRT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakashima, T., Usami, S., Aiba, T., Oishi, S., Kimura, Y., Kawakami, S., … Kusano, K. (2020). Novel Non-Invasive Index for Prediction of Responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using High-Resolution Magnetocardiography. Circulation Journal, 84(12), 216–2174. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0325

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free