Noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial tachycardia after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is commonly encountered after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. But no study exclusively on noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right AT (NCTI-RAT) post-AF ablation has been reported. The present study aims to describe its prevalence, electrophysiological mechanisms, and ablation strategy and to further discuss its relationship with AF. Methods: From July 2006 to November 2009, 350 consecutive patients underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. A total of seven patients (2.0%) developed NCTI-RAT after left atrium ablation for AF. In these highly selected patients (two male, mean age 54 ± 11 years, mean left atrium diameter of 34 ± 7 cm), all had circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in their initial procedures and three of them had additional complex fractionated electrograms ablation in the left atrium and the coronary sinus. Results: Totally, nine NCTI-RATs were mapped and successfully ablated in the right atrium with a mean cycle length of 273 ± 64 ms in seven patients. Five ATs in three patients were electrophysiologically proved to be macroreentry and the remaining four were focal activation. All the ATs were successfully abolished by catheter ablation. After a mean follow-up of 29 ± 15 months post-AT ablation, all patients were free of AT and AF off antiarrhythmic drugs. Conclusions: NCTI-RAT is relatively less common post-AF ablation. Totally, 2.0% of paroxysmal AF patients were revealed to have NCTI-RAT. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ju, W., Yang, B., Chen, H., Zhang, F., Zhai, L., Cao, K., & Chen, M. (2011). Noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial tachycardia after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation. PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 34(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02970.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free