HARVEST TIME AS A MODULATOR OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS FOR THE INDUSTRY

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As a fresh food, sweet potatoes are highlighted for their taste and appearance. In the industry, they are valued for their starch and sugar content. In both scenarios, much attention has been given to the composition of bioactive compounds. The application of abiotic stresses seems to induce an overproduction of these compounds in some vegetables. The objective was to examine the influence of harvest time on the synthesis and accumulation of bioactive compounds in varieties of minimally processed sweet potatoes with different flesh colors. Sweet potato cultivars (Beterraba, Jerimum, Mãe de Família Roxa, and BRS Cuia) were harvested at 120, 150, and 180 days after planting, then subjected to minimal processing and stored at 5 ºC for 10 days. The most recommended time for harvesting sweet potatoes in semi-arid conditions for minimal processing by the industry is between 150 and 180 days. This is the period when the sweet potatoes exhibit the best quality for fresh consumption, as detected in ‘Mãe de Família Roxa’ and ‘Jerimum’. ‘BRS Cuia’ harvested at 120 days showed the highest phenolic compound levels, the highest polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase enzyme activities, and the most intense browning symptoms. In addition to its starch content, it can be used as a raw material for the extraction of phenolic compounds of interest. ‘Beterraba’ showed low sugar values, rendering them unfavorable for fresh consumption or minimal processing. However, this cultivar also exhibited a high content of carotenoids, making them bio-factories for the food and pharmaceutical industries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santos, V. N., Fonseca, K. S., DE SÁ, S. A., Souza, J. F. D. N., Júnior, A. P. B., & Simões, A. D. N. (2022). HARVEST TIME AS A MODULATOR OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS FOR THE INDUSTRY. Revista Caatinga, 35(4), 956–963. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252022v35n423rc

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free