Abstract
Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Materials and Methods: We searched electronic databases and other sources for randomized controlled trials comparing IVIg with placebo or other treatment for adults with AD. Primary outcome was change from baseline in Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog). Results: Five placebo-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, IVIg 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg once every two weeks did not change ADAS-Cog score (weighted mean difference: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: −1.46 to 2.20 and 0.77, −1.34 to 2.88, respectively). Furthermore, except for an increase in the incidence of rash, IVIg did not affect the incidence of other adverse events. Conclusion: IVIg, albeit safe, is inefficacious for treatment of patients with AD. Future trials targeting earlier stages of disease or applying different dosing regimens may be warranted to clarify its therapeutic potential.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Manolopoulos, A., Andreadis, P., Malandris, K., Avgerinos, I., Karagiannis, T., Kapogiannis, D., … Bekiari, E. (2019, August 1). Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317519843720
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.