The Impact of Stratified Surgical Margins on Survival Outcomes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This multicenter study examines the impact of stratified surgical margins on treatment outcomes in oral SCC. Methods: Margins were stratified into 1 mm increments from 0 to ≥ 5 mm. Outcomes included local recurrence, overall and disease-specific survivals. Sub-analyses assessed the impact of margin status by risk factors, oral subsites, and peripheral versus deep margins. Results: Among 2737 patients, ≥ 2 to < 3 mm margins were associated with improved outcomes compared to 0 mm. Further benefits were observed in the ≥ 4 to < 5 mm group. The differences between these two groups were not statistically significant. Improved outcomes were observed with ≥ 2 mm deep margins, but not for peripheral margins. High-risk tumors had better overall and disease-specific survivals with ≥ 2 mm margins. Subsites of the tongue, palate, mandible, and floor of the mouth had improved local control with ≥ 2 mm margins. Conclusion: Margins beyond 4 mm do not confer additional oncological benefit, while achieving ≥ 2 mm, especially in deep margins or high-risk tumors, is critical for optimal outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, T., Clark, J., David, M., Schache, A., Bajwa, M. S., Low, T. H., … Batstone, M. D. (2026). The Impact of Stratified Surgical Margins on Survival Outcomes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis. Head and Neck, 48(2), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free