Abstract
Many empirically minded philosophers have used neuroscientific data to argue against the multiple realization of cognitive functions in existing biological organisms. I argue that neuroscientists themselves have proposed a biologically based concept of multiple realization as an alternative to interpreting empirical findings in terms of one-to-one structure-function mappings. I introduce this concept and its associated research framework and also how some of the main neuroscience-based arguments against multiple realization go wrong. Copyright 2010 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Carrie, F. (2010). Neuroscience and the multiple realization of cognitive functions. Philosophy of Science, 77(3), 419–456. https://doi.org/10.1086/652964
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.