Intravascular ultrasound in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions: Variation in utilization and impact on in-hospital outcomes from the nationwide inpatient sample (2006-2011)

55Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) utilization during lower limb endovascular interventions as regards postprocedural complications and amputation. Methods: The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions were identified using appropriate ICD-9 procedure codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and amputation; the secondary outcome was postprocedural complications. Model results are given as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Hospitalization costs were also assessed. Results: Overall, among the 92,714 patients extracted from the database during the observation period, IVUS was used in 1299 (1.4%) patients. IVUS utilization during lower extremity peripheral vascular procedures was independently predictive of a lower rate of postprocedural complications (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99, p=0.037) as well as lower amputation rates (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77, p<0.001) without any significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis also revealed IVUS utilization to be predictive of a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs ($1333, 95% CI -$167 to +$2833, p=0.082). Conclusion: IVUS use during lower limb endovascular interventions is predictive of lower postprocedural complication and amputation rates with a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panaich, S. S., Arora, S., Patel, N., Patel, N. J., Savani, C., Patel, A., … Badheka, A. O. (2016). Intravascular ultrasound in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions: Variation in utilization and impact on in-hospital outcomes from the nationwide inpatient sample (2006-2011). Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 23(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602815620780

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free