A new perspective towards failure of gamma nail systems

  • Dragosloveanu Ş
  • Dragosloveanu C
  • Stanca H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Uncommon causes of nail failures and surgical reinterventions were determined. The study included 23 osteo- porotic patients, 13 of whom followed a fast recovery program with early walking (FWB group). The other 10 patients were not allowed full weight bearing until 6 weeks (NFWB group). The T-score was determined before surgery for all cases. A case with a nail breakage after a failed DCS implant fixed in another clinic was also analyzed. The nail was revised and the broken implant underwent a metallurgic and microscopic examination. The average T-score was 2.5 for the patients that followed the fast recovery program and 2.7 for the patients from non-full weight bearing. Four patients, 1 from the NFWB group and 3 from FWB group, presented a screw cut-out. It was found that the errors of the guiding instruments may create dents, scratches or micro-fractures on the titanium coating that lead to an early implant failure. Imperfect reduc- tion leads to incorrect implant placement and a high incidence of failure. Damaging the titanium protective coating, in a low force, high cycles scenario can cause structural failure. Delays in fracture healing and material fatigue are the most common causes of nail failure and can lead to catastrophic complications.Copyright © 2020 Spandidos Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dragosloveanu, Ş., Dragosloveanu, C., Stanca, H., Cotor, D., Dragosloveanu, C., & Stoica, C. (2020). A new perspective towards failure of gamma nail systems. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 20(6), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free