Superior long-term patency of no-touch vein graft compared to conventional vein grafts in over 1500 consecutive patients

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term angiographic patency of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) harvested using the no-touch technique compared to the conventional technique. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. The inclusion criteria were individuals who underwent a CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) between January 1995 and July 2020, and who successively needed a clinically-driven angiography. The primary endpoint was long-term patency. The secondary endpoints were differences in patency based on sub-group analysis (single vs. sequential graft, divided by target vessel). Results: The study included 1520 individuals (618 no-touch, 825 conventional and 77 arterial grafts). The mean clinical follow-up time was 8.4 years ± 5.5 years. The patency per patient was 70.7% in the no-touch grafts vs. 46.7% in the conventional grafts (p < 0.001, OR = 2.8). The graft patency was 75.9% in the no-touch grafts vs. 62.8% in the conventional grafts (p < 0.001, OR = 1.8). Conclusions: The no-touch vein grafts were associated with statistically significantly higher patency at long-term compared to the conventional grafts. Clinical trial registration: NCT04656366, 7 December 2020.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrari, G., Loayza, R., Azari, A., Geijer, H., Cao, Y., Carlsson, R., … Souza, D. (2024). Superior long-term patency of no-touch vein graft compared to conventional vein grafts in over 1500 consecutive patients. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03057-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free