While there is an abundant use of macro data in the social sciences, little attention is given to the sources or the construction of these data. Owing to the restricted amount of indices or items, researchers most often apply the 'available data at hand'. Since the opportunities to analyse data are constantly increasing and the availability of macro indicators is improving as well, one may be enticed to incorporate even qualitatively inferior indicators for the sake of statistically significant results. The pitfalls of applying biased indicators or using instruments with unknown methodological characteristics are biased estimates, false statistical inferences and, as one potential consequence, the derivation of misleading policy recommendations. This Special Issue assembles contributions that attempt to stimulate the missing debate about the criteria of assessing aggregate data and their measurement properties for comparative analyses.
CITATION STYLE
Neumann, R., & Graeff, P. (2015). Quantitative approaches to comparative analyses: Data properties and their implications for theory, measurement and modelling. European Political Science, 14(4), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.59
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.