Daily versus intermittent iron supplementation among children with iron deficiency anemia: A meta-analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate daily versus intermittent iron supplementation among children. Methods: The author searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials and compared daily versus intermittent iron supplementation. The keywords iron deficiency anemia, iron therapy, daily, twice per week, and once weekly were used. The search was limited to the period January 2012 up to November 2023. The age of participant range from two months to 18 years. Result: Out of the 735 studies, 540 were eligible after removal of duplication, of them, 28 full texts were screened and only 10 studies were included. Daily iron supplementation was better in improving hemoglobin odd ratio, 0.41, 95 CI, 0.38-0.44, Z=26.53, and p-Value <0.001 than intermittent prescription odd ratio, 0.69, 95 CI, 0.67-0.72, Z=49.98, and P-value < 0.001. Conclusion: Daily supplementation increased hemoglobin more compared to weekly or twice/week among children with iron deficiency anemia. Further larger studies assessing tolerance and compliance are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alblewi, S. M. (2024, December 1). Daily versus intermittent iron supplementation among children with iron deficiency anemia: A meta-analysis. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. Professional Medical Publications. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.11.10344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free