Slip-resistant footwear reduces slips among National Health Service workers in England: A randomised controlled trial

9Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assess the effectiveness of 5* GRIP-rated slip-resistant footwear in preventing slips in the workplace compared to usual footwear (control group). A multicentre, randomised controlled trial; 4553 National Health Service (NHS) staff were randomised 1:1 to the intervention group (provided with 5* GRIP-rated slip-resistant footwear) or the control group. The primary outcome of incidence rate of self-reported slips in the workplace over 14 weeks was analysed using a mixed-effects negative binomial model. Secondary outcome measures included incidence rate of falls from a slip, falls not from a slip, proportion of participants reporting a slip, fall or fracture and time to first slip and fall. 6743 slips were reported: 2633 in the intervention group (mean 1.16 per participant, range 0 to 36) and 4110 in the control group (mean 1.80 per participant, range 0 to 83). There was a statistically significant reduction in slip rate in the intervention group relative to the control group (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.63, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.70, p<0.001). Statistically significant differences, in favour of the intervention group, were observed in falls from a slip (IRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.92, p=0.03), the proportion of participants who reported a slip (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66, p<0.001) or fall (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99, p=0.04) and time to first slip (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80, p<0.001). The offer and provision of 5* GRIP-rated footwear reduced slips in NHS staff in the workplace. ISRCTN33051393.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cockayne, S., Fairhurst, C., Frost, G., Liddle, M., Cunningham-Burley, R., Zand, M., … Torgerson, D. J. (2021). Slip-resistant footwear reduces slips among National Health Service workers in England: A randomised controlled trial. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 78(7), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106914

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free