Effects of ruxolitinib on infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: a meta-analysis

16Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Infections in ruxolitinib-treated myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients were reported frequently. This work aimed to systematically estimate the risk of infection associated with ruxolitinib in MPN patients. Methods: The PUBMED, CNKI, EMBASE, Cochrane and CBM databases were searched to identify all related studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to express the difference between groups. I 2 was calculated to evaluate heterogeneity. Revman software was used to conduct the analysis. Results: Eleven randomized control trials were included in this analysis. The risk of overall infections was not different at the early stage of ruxolitinib use (OR, 95%CI: 1.23, [0.91, 1.67]). In the extension phase, overall infection was significantly lower in patients receiving ruxolitinib (OR, 95%CI: 0.53, [0.36, 0.79]). Herpes zoster infection was at higher risk both at early stage and in the extension phase (OR, 95%CI: 7.39, [1.33, 41.07]), (OR, 95%CI: 5.23, [1.46, 18.79]), respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggested that ruxolitinib increased the risk of herpes zoster infection. However, current studies were not enough to estimate the effects of ruxolitinib on the risk of overall infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luo, Q., Xiao, Z., & Peng, L. (2021). Effects of ruxolitinib on infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: a meta-analysis. Hematology (United Kingdom), 26(1), 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2021.1967256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free