Abstract
Objective: Patient handover is an important element of continuity, quality and safety in patient care. Handover without standardized protocols is prone to information loss and might be a possible danger to patient safety. Checklists are established methods that help to structure complex processes in other high-risk fields such as aviation. In the past few years, their implementation has attracted research interest in medicine. We hypothesize that a checklist for handover between anaesthesiologist and post-anaesthesia care unit nurse will increase the amount of information transfer during patient handover after anaesthesia. Design and Setting: A total of 120 post-anaesthesia patient handovers were recorded on video and analyzed. Forty handovers before the implementation of the checklist and 80 after the implementation of the checklist, randomized into two groups: with and without the use of the checklist. Main Outcome Measures: An overall number of items handed over, handover of specific items and duration of the handover were analyzed. Results: With the use of the written checklist, the overall items handed over increased significantly from a median of 32.4-48.7%. The duration of handover increased from a median of 86-121 s. Instructions about items that should be included in handovers, but without the use of a written checklist, was not associated with an increase in the number of items handed over or duration of the interview. Conclusions: This study suggests that the use of a checklist for post-anaesthesia handover might improve the quality of patient handover by increasing the information handed over. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Salzwedel, C., Bartz, H. J., Kühnelt, I., Appel, D., Haupt, O., Maisch, S., & Schmidt, G. N. (2013). The effect of a checklist on the quality of post-anaesthesia patient handover: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 25(2), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt009
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.