RNAseq by Total RNA Library Identifies Additional RNAs Compared to Poly(A) RNA Library

45Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The most popular RNA library used for RNA sequencing is the poly(A) captured RNA library. This library captures RNA based on the presence of poly(A) tails at the 3′ end. Another type of RNA library for RNA sequencing is the total RNA library which differs from the poly(A) library by capture method and price. The total RNA library costs more and its capture of RNA is not dependent on the presence of poly(A) tails. In practice, only ribosomal RNAs and small RNAs are washed out in the total RNA library preparation. To evaluate the ability of detecting RNA for both RNA libraries we designed a study using RNA sequencing data of the same two breast cancer cell lines from both RNA libraries. We found that the RNA expression values captured by both RNA libraries were highly correlated. However, the number of RNAs captured was significantly higher for the total RNA library. Furthermore, we identify several subsets of protein coding RNAs that were not captured efficiently by the poly(A) library. One of the most noticeable is the histone-encode genes, which lack the poly(A) tail.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, Y., Zhao, S., Sheng, Q., Guo, M., Lehmann, B., Pietenpol, J., … Shyr, Y. (2015). RNAseq by Total RNA Library Identifies Additional RNAs Compared to Poly(A) RNA Library. BioMed Research International, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/862130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free