Factor Analysis of Interteam Collaboration Process for Family Planning Program (Longitudinal Prospective Time Series Design)

  • Prasetyorini A
  • Rochmah T
  • Suhariadi F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. The success of Family Planning (FP) program is strongly determined by a collaboration process of two organizations responsible in managing the program. There has not any collaboration concept discussing the program within team level but belonging to different organizations. Objective. To conduct factor analysis of interteam collaboration process in cross-organization for family planning. Methods. This was a quantitative study with a longitudinal prospective time series design conducted at the public health center and the family planning extension worker team in Lamongan. Interteam collaboration data were obtained by questionnaires for three months and analyzed by factor analysis utilizing SPSS program. Results. Factor analysis in interteam collaboration resulted in KMO value and Bartlett’s test > 0.5 with 0.000 significance and MSA value in Anti Image Metrics > 0.5.  The result of variable extraction process and factor rotation, with eigen value was 1.661. The cumulative total variety value was 83.057%.  Shared value (shared structural dimensions and shared team autonomy) and mutual benefit indicators could explain interteam collaboration variables. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that interteam collaboration process was an three factor, effort for shared structural dimensions and shared team autonomy process by considering mutual benefit of interteam belonging to different organizations.   Keyword:  interteam, collaboration,  time series, program

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prasetyorini, A., Rochmah, T. N., Suhariadi, F., Djunawan, A., & Drastyana, S. (2022). Factor Analysis of Interteam Collaboration Process for Family Planning Program (Longitudinal Prospective Time Series Design). Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(E), 1535–1541. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9929

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free