A typology of practices of legitimation to categorise accountability relations

10Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter presents the central element of an accountability analysis approach-a typology of four practices of legitimation: discursive, bureaucratic, technocratic and financial. These are empirically derived and defined in generic terms as social relations premised on accountability. Their study can characterise accountability under energy transitions. Discursive legitimation practices normalise certain perspectives over others through textual and spoken interventions across a variety of forums. Bureaucratic legitimation practices, often codified and sequential, validate some actions and actors and constrain others. Technocratic legitimation practices perform systematic checks and approval of actions that entail technical expertise. Financial legitimation practices, often spatially remote and materially elusive, enable actors to block action or to fulfil financial requirements and proceed with material actions, shaping sectoral change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sareen, S. (2019). A typology of practices of legitimation to categorise accountability relations. In Enabling Sustainable Energy Transitions: Practices of Legitimation and Accountable Governance (pp. 15–31). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26891-6_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free