Phase i study investigating the safety and feasibility of combining imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) with sorafenib in patients with refractory castration-resistant prostate cancer

19Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of sorafenib (S) plus imatinib (IM) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients.Methods:Refractory CRPC patients were enrolled onto this 33 dose escalation designed study. Imatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined on day 15, 4 h post dose with a validated LC-MS assay.Results:Seventeen patients were enrolled; 10 evaluable (6 at 400 mg S qd with 300 mg IM qd (DL0) and 4 at 400 mg S bid with 300 mg IM qd (DL1)); inevaluable patients received 1 cycle. The median age was 73 (57-89); median prostatic serum antigen was 284 ng ml 1 (11.7-9027). Median number of prior non-hormonal therapies was 3 (1-12). Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome. Maximum tolerated dose was 400 mg S and 300 mg IM both daily. No biochemical responses were observed. Two patients had stable disease by RECIST. Median time to progression was 2 months (1-5). Median OS was 6 months (1-30) with 3/17 patients (17%) alive at 21 months median follow-up. Ten patients had PK data suggesting that S reduced IM clearance by 55%, resulting in 77% increased exposure (P=0.005; compared with historical data).Conclusion:This is the first report showing that SIM can be administered in CRPC at a dose of 400 mg S and 300 mg IM, daily. © 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nabhan, C., Villines, D., Valdez, T. V., Tolzien, K., Lestingi, T. M., Bitran, J. D., … Beumer, J. H. (2012). Phase i study investigating the safety and feasibility of combining imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) with sorafenib in patients with refractory castration-resistant prostate cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 107(4), 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free