Care as Critique of Care: Public Services, Social Security and Ritual Responsiveness

3Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Socialist governance and popular sovereignty require state administration of care. In the People's Republic of China (PRC) today, such state care is provided in the form of public services and in the guarantee of social security. Ideally, different levels of government should foster relations of care in local communities and remain responsive to the people. Local self-government, relations of mutual support and ritual communities, however, reveal the deficits of state care. Much like general philosophies of care, such local ethics of care propose universal benchmarks against which social practice can be measured. This article outlines the main contours of state care in the post-Mao Zedong PRC, and contrasts its findings with empirical research on public services, social security and ritual responsiveness. Mutual help, neighbourhood communities and ritual practice, in particular, provide alternative models of care. As such, they can be extended and universalized, and offer possibilities for a critique of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feuchtwang, S. (2023). Care as Critique of Care: Public Services, Social Security and Ritual Responsiveness. China Quarterly, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574102300036X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free