The case of Donald Rumsfeld: leadership traps in national security

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Taking its point of departure in Donald Rumsfeld’s second term as US Secretary of Defense (2001–2006), this article analyses the crisis of strategic leadership in Western national security. Three “traps” are identified that explain why Donald Rumsfeld ultimately was a failure as defence secretary and demonstrate the perils of national security governance. These traps are termed the inquisitor trap, the strong leader trap and the delegation trap. It is argued that our understanding of strategic leadership in national security, particularly in defence, can benefit from insights gained from the study of strategic leadership in business. As such, this article engages the recent trend of merging insights from business and military strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rasmussen, M. V. (2016). The case of Donald Rumsfeld: leadership traps in national security. Defence Studies, 16(4), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2016.1222865

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free