The Role of the Attorney General's Office in Conducting Wiretapping for Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: A Normative Juridical Analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Act Criminal Corruption includes extraordinary crimes or, more known, crime collar white, so for its eradication, the need effort is not usually one of them via Tapping. As one of the law enforcers, the attorney owns authority in the matter and does tapping. Research methods used in writing This is juridical normative. Conclusion writing This is an attorney carrying out his authority in the matter. Does tapping in eradication follow criminal corruption? Not yet Can do tapping independently where in law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Change on Constitution Number 16 of 2004 concerning attorney Republic of Indonesia Article 30C letter i Not yet based justice. Even though the given authority will not yet use his authority, that's because there is a constitutional special governing procedural law implementation tapping.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haedar, Akub, M. S., Maskun, & Ilyas, A. (2024). The Role of the Attorney General’s Office in Conducting Wiretapping for Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: A Normative Juridical Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.1.00085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free