Rorty and the Question of Normativity: Replies to Commentators on Reconstructing Pragmatism

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This response to insightful commentaries on my book, from Richard Shusterman, Susan Dieleman, Raff Donelson, and Colin Koopman, takes up the recurring theme of the nature of normativity on a Rortyan view. To frame my individual replies, I revisit the Davidsonian account of epistemic interaction that influences Rorty's mature view and suggest that the norms implicit in Davidsonian triangulation are insufficient to support Rorty's antiauthoritarianism in ethics and epistemology. To address the resulting question of how to account for norms of responsibility and obligation within Rorty's thought, I highlight key strands of the pragmatic tradition, originating with Peirce but extending through James, Addams, and Dewey, that Rorty reconstructs in the process of developing the full implications of prioritizing democracy over philosophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voparil, C. (2022). Rorty and the Question of Normativity: Replies to Commentators on Reconstructing Pragmatism. Contemporary Pragmatism, 19(4), 430–459. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-bja10058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free