Hardcastle Takes a HIT! Commentary: Why Sprint Interval Training is Inappropriate for a Largely Sedentary population

  • Hardcastle S
  • Costa E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our previous paper prompted a lively debate concerning the ĞĸcĂcy of sprint interval training (SIT) [1,2]. For clarification SIT refers to protocols that involve supramaximal efforts (>100% maximal oxygen uptake) and high-intensity-intervaltraining (HIIT) involves ‘vigorous’ or ‘near-maximal’ efforts (target intensity: 80% to 100% peak heart-rate) [3]. In the current commentary, we return to the role of affect and perceived effort on exercise adherence raised in the recent commentary by Jung et al. [4]. We contend that the considerable anticipated effort required to participate in SIT and aversive psychological states experienced during such 'all out' supramaximal exercise may likely to damage adherence to such protocols.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardcastle, S. J., & Costa, E. C. (2018). Hardcastle Takes a HIT! Commentary: Why Sprint Interval Training is Inappropriate for a Largely Sedentary population. Annals of Behavioural Science, 04(01). https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-7975.100032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free