The three images of EU strategic autonomy: perspectives on wedging, binding and hedging

11Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article considers concepts of European Union Strategic Autonomy in light of the growing scholarly literature on wedging and binding. The article presents three ideal types of strategic autonomy as the images of ‘responsibility’, ‘hedging’ and ‘independence’. It assesses each of these images against the wedging and binding strategies of the United States and China. In doing so, it observes how the EU’s political agency conditions American and Chinese wedging and binding strategies. Indeed, the article surmises that internal binding within the EU is a core feature of any attempt to enhance the autonomy of the Union. However, the article also provides a novel interpretation of the relationship between wedging, binding and hedging and it shows how EU autonomy as hedging may complicate US and Chinese efforts to wedge or bind the EU.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fiott, D. (2025). The three images of EU strategic autonomy: perspectives on wedging, binding and hedging. Journal of European Integration, 47(6), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2537369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free