Comparison of medical students' diagnostic reasoning skills in a traditional and a problem based learning curriculum

  • Goss B
  • Reid K
  • Dodds A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: This cross sectional study aimed to investigate the relative effectiveness of a problem based learning curriculum (PBL) and a traditional curriculum (TC) in the development of medical students’ diagnostic reasoning skills. Methods: Junior and senior clinical students (n = 431) at a single clinical school of the University of Melbourne self-administered Bordage et al.’s Diagnostic Thinking Invento-ry (DTI) to assess diagnostic reasoning skills during transi-tion from a TC to a PBL curriculum. Mean scores for the flexibility in thinking and memory structure sub-scales were compared for students at junior and senior clinical levels under the two curricula using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Results: An effect of curriculum, Wilks’ Lambda = .95, F (2, 426) = 11.67, p < .001, ηp2 =.05 and level of trainee, Wilks’ Lambda = .86, F (2, 426) = 35.00, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goss, B., Reid, K., Dodds, A., & McColl, G. (2011). Comparison of medical students’ diagnostic reasoning skills in a traditional and a problem based learning curriculum. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4e64.055a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free