Species recognition and cryptic species in the Tuber indicum complex

50Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Morphological delimitation of Asian black truffles, including Tuber himalayense, T. indicum, T. sinense, T. pseudohimalayense, T. formosanum and T. pseudoexcavatum, has remained problematic and even phylogenetic analyses have been controversial. In this study, we combined five years of field investigation in China with morphological study and DNA sequences analyses (ITS, LSU and β-tubulin) of 131 Tuber specimens to show that T. pseudohimalayense and T. pseudoexcavatum are the same species. T. formosanum is a separate species based on its host plants and geographic distribution, combined with minor morphological difference from T. indicum. T. sinense should be treated as a synonym of T. indicum. Our results demonstrate that the present T. indicum, a single described morphological species, should include at least two separate phylogenetic species. These findings are of high importance for truffle taxonomy and reveal and preserve the richness of truffle diversity. © 2011 Chen et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J., Guo, S. X., & Liu, P. G. (2011). Species recognition and cryptic species in the Tuber indicum complex. PLoS ONE, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014625

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free