DYNAMIC-MATURATIONAL MODEL OF ATTACHMENT AND ADAPTATION VERSUS ABC+D ASSESSMENTS OF ATTACHMENT IN CHILD PROTECTION AND TREATMENT: REPLY TO VAN IJZENDOORN, BAKERMANS, STEELE, & GRANQVIST (2018)

8Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this brief response, we commend the commentary authors for joining a dialogue about the future of individual differences in attachment both around person-specific forensic and clinical issues also around working together to develop theory and coding practices. We point to several areas of explicit and implicit agreement and discuss several misunderstandings. We close with a proposal for future work together, possibly using the only set of video-recorded Strange Situations classified by Mary Ainsworth as a starting point from which we can explore alternative means of extending and expanding her work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crittenden, P. M., & Spieker, S. J. (2018, November 1). DYNAMIC-MATURATIONAL MODEL OF ATTACHMENT AND ADAPTATION VERSUS ABC+D ASSESSMENTS OF ATTACHMENT IN CHILD PROTECTION AND TREATMENT: REPLY TO VAN IJZENDOORN, BAKERMANS, STEELE, & GRANQVIST (2018). Infant Mental Health Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free