Assessment of Path Model Fit: Evidence of Effectiveness and Recommendations for use of the RMSEA-P

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We review the development of path model fit measures for latent variable models and highlight how they are different from global fit measures. Next, we consider findings from two published simulation articles that reach different conclusions about the effectiveness of one path model fit measure (RMSEA-P). We then report the results of a new simulation study aimed at resolving the questions of whether and how the RMSEA-P should be used by organizational researchers. These results show that the RMSEA-P and its confidence interval is very effective with multiple indicator models at identifying misspecifications across large and small sample sizes and is effective at identifying true models at moderate to large sample sizes. We conclude with recommendations for how the RMSEA-P can be incorporated along with other information into model evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, L. J., Williams, A. R., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2024). Assessment of Path Model Fit: Evidence of Effectiveness and Recommendations for use of the RMSEA-P. Organizational Research Methods, 27(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221124946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free