How to make sense of pertussis immunogenicity data

61Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Studies on serologic correlates to protection in pertussis were reviewed. Trials in the 1950s showed that agglutinogen titers correlated to protection of whole-cell vaccines, but postvaccination antibodies against pertussis toxin (PT) and against filamentous hemagglutinin did not in a later trial of acellular vaccines. However, in household studies nested in 2 recent trials, preexposure antibody levels against pertactin and against fimbriae correlated with protection against typical and mild pertussis, and anti-PT correlated only with protection against typical pertussis. These findings could be used by regulatory agencies to license pertussis vaccines. A reference laboratory for pertussis should distribute panels to control interlaboratory variation in recommended assays, and a minimal response should be set for each pertussis antigen. We conclude that 2 studies have shown correlates between measurable anti-pertactin, anti-fimbriae, and anti-PT antibody levels at exposure and individual protection against pertussis. We suggest that postvaccination response rates may be used as surrogate markers of protection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olin, P., Hallander, H. O., Gustafsson, L., Reizenstein, E., & Storsaeter, J. (2001). How to make sense of pertussis immunogenicity data. In Clinical Infectious Diseases (Vol. 33). https://doi.org/10.1086/322564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free