The safety of esophageal cancer surgery during COVID-19

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically challenged the safety of on esophageal cancer (EC) surgery during COVID-19. The study aimed to evaluate the safety of EC surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-P 2015 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022335164). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Chinese Scientific Journal database, and Wan Fang database was conducted to identify potentially relevant publications from January 2020 to May 2022. All data were independently extracted by two researchers. We will apply a fixed-effect model or random effect model basis on the heterogeneity test and employ with RevMan 5.4.1 software for data synthesis. The dichotomous surgical outcomes used risk ratios or risk differences, and for continuous surgical outcomes, mean differences (MD) or standardized MD, both with 95% confidence intervals were used. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, anastomotic leaks, and mortality. The secondary outcomes were total hospital stay, postoperative stay, preoperative waiting, operation time, blood loss, transfusion, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, number of patients needing ICU stay, and 30-day readmission. Results: This study will comprehensively summarize the high-quality trials to determine the safety of EC surgery during COVID-19. Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis will present evidence for the safety of EC surgery during COVID-19.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Q., Yao, C., Li, Y., Luo, L., Xie, F., Xiong, Q., … Feng, P. (2022, October 14). The safety of esophageal cancer surgery during COVID-19. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030929

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free