Dilemmas of policy innovation in the public sector: A case study of the national innovation summit

17Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Policy innovation is a significant challenge for the public sector. This article illustrates its magnitude through a case study of the National Innovation Summit. The article concludes that the Summit represented an elaborate process of search and engagement that sanctioned an outcome that was, in most respects, largely pre-determined. Its outreach and deliberations served the political purpose of mobilising industry and media attention and communicating the government's commitment. But there is no evidence that it exercised any substantive influence on policy development. The obstacles confounding any other outcome are considerable. Strategic thinking is inhibited by various organisational factors including lock-in to a present successful strategy, the constraints on policy choices associated with multiple veto points and the need to maintain medium term fiscal and policy discipline across a wide range of agencies and claimants. The article explores ways these inhibitions might be overcome. © 2009 National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marsh, I., & Edwards, L. (2009). Dilemmas of policy innovation in the public sector: A case study of the national innovation summit. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00647.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free