Retrieval-augmented generation elevates local LLM quality in radiology contrast media consultation

38Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate significant potential in healthcare applications, but clinical deployment is limited by privacy concerns and insufficient medical domain training. This study investigated whether retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can improve locally deployable LLM for radiology contrast media consultation. In 100 synthetic iodinated contrast media consultations we compared Llama 3.2-11B (baseline and RAG) with three cloud-based models—GPT-4o mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku. A blinded radiologist ranked the five replies per case, and three LLM-based judges scored accuracy, safety, structure, tone, applicability and latency. Under controlled conditions, RAG eliminated hallucinations (0% vs 8%; χ²₍Yates₎ = 6.38, p = 0.012) and improved mean rank by 1.3 (Z = –4.82, p < 0.001), though performance gaps with cloud models persist. The RAG-enhanced model remained faster (2.6 s vs 4.9–7.3 s) while the LLM-based judges preferred it over GPT-4o mini, though the radiologist ranked GPT-4o mini higher. RAG thus provides meaningful improvements for local clinical LLMs while maintaining the privacy benefits of on-premise deployment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wada, A., Tanaka, Y., Nishizawa, M., Yamamoto, A., Akashi, T., Hagiwara, A., … Aoki, S. (2025). Retrieval-augmented generation elevates local LLM quality in radiology contrast media consultation. Npj Digital Medicine, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01802-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free