Scientific evidence on non-pharmacological methods for relief of labor pain

32Citations
Citations of this article
167Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To identify studies on the efficacy of non-pharmacological methods in reducing labor pain in the national and international literature. Methods: Integrative review in the MEDLINE/PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, LILACS, and BDENF databases, limiting to studies published between 2013 and 2018, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. The PICo methodology was used to build the research question and select the controlled and uncontrolled descriptors, which were combined with the "AND", "OR," and "NOT" Boolean operators. Results: A total of 19 articles were selected. The non-pharmacological methods found were: acupuncture and its core variations (acupressure and auriculotherapy) (29.17%), hydrotherapy (25%), perineal exercises with the Swiss ball (16.67%), thermal therapies (8.33%), and other methods (20.83%). Conclusion: Acupuncture and acupressure worked on both physiological aspects of pain and the subjective nature of pain. The warm bath, music therapy, aromatherapy, and breathing techniques promoted relaxation and decreased the levels of anxiety. Thermal therapies contributed to local analgesia in regions affected by pain. Exercises with the Swiss ball were important for pain relief, and the vertical position was important for labor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mascarenhas, V. H. A., Lima, T. R., Dantas E Silva, F. M., Dos Santos Negreiros, F., Santos, J. D. M., Moura, M. Á. P., … Jorge, H. M. F. (2019). Scientific evidence on non-pharmacological methods for relief of labor pain. ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem, 32(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201900048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free