Language and Emotion: Certain English-Arabic Translations Are Not Equivalent

27Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Happiness, sadness, and anger are translated into Arabic as farah, huzn, and ghudub, respectively, by the translation-back translation method. But are these translations equivalent? To be equivalent, they must have the same referents, specifically, show a high correlation between profiles of endorsement and a similar breadth of endorsement when used to refer to emotions. Here, English-speaking Americans, English-speaking Palestinians, and Arabic-speaking Palestinians (N = 60, 60, and 42, respectively) rated the extent to which each of 12 words referred to the various emotions conveyed by 22 facial expressions. Only one translation (happiness-farah) passed both tests of equivalence. All others differed with culture or language. © 2013 SAGE Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kayyal, M. H., & Russell, J. A. (2013). Language and Emotion: Certain English-Arabic Translations Are Not Equivalent. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12461004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free