Exploring the experiences of content experts with item vetting during item bank development

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To explore content experts’ experiences with item vetting during item bank development at a public sector medical university of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Methods: An exploratory study was carried out from December 2022 to February 2023 at a public sector medical college of Rawalpindi. A purposive sampling technique was employed to collect data from all content experts of the study institute who participated in item vetting activity during pre-exam moderation in the university. A pilot-tested semi-structured interview guide was utilized, interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed. Participants’ anonymity was ensured. Various quality assurance strategies were employed to ensure the trustworthiness of the findings. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data and themes were finalized by achieving consensus among all authors. Results: Six themes overarching the fourteen subthemes emerged from the data. Participants expressed a profound sense of satisfaction and valued their experience in refining expertise in constructing multiple-choice questions (MCQs). It was widely acknowledged that such activities not only contribute to the enhancement of item development skills but also improve quality of items. Conclusions: The consistent implementation of item vetting routines, in conjunction with diligent adherence to item writing protocols, contributes to quality assurance measures in assessment. Item bank development for fair and transparent assessment ensures production of competent healthcare professionals filtering incompetent ones hence improving health care services in the community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aziz, A., Sabqat, M., Kiran, F., & Mirza, T. I. (2024). Exploring the experiences of content experts with item vetting during item bank development. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 40(6), 1241–1246. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.6.8664

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free