Comparison of initial tumor responses to transarterial bland embolization and drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity-score matching analysis

Abstract

Background: Transarterial bland embolization (TABE) is widely used to treat the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and can lead to ischemic necrosis of the tumor. In this study, we used the propensity-score matching (PSM) method to compare the initial responses of treatment-naïve HCC patients to TABE and drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and the safety of these treatments. Methods: Patients with treatment-naïve HCC, who had been admitted to 2 medical centers from January 2016 to December 2020, were enrolled as the research subjects. The data of 26 patients treated with TABE for ruptured HCC and 52 patients treated with DEB-TACE for primary HCC were collected according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a PSM analysis was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of these two interventional techniques 1 month postoperatively. Results: In relation to ruptured HCC, TABE had a hemostatic success rate of 97.0%. Before PSM, the TABE group had a larger maximum tumor diameter (P<0.05), a higher proportion of multiple tumors (P<0.05), a higher proportion of Child-Pugh class B ( P<0.05), and a higher proportion of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B ( P<0.05) than the DEB-TACE group. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of these two groups were well balanced, and there was no significant difference in patients' initial therapeutic responses and tumor recurrence rates (both P>0.05). The multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor size was an independent predictor of the objective response rate (ORR) [odds ratio (OR): 3.312; 95% CI: 0.152-5.944; P<0.05]. Tumor number and BCLC stage also affected ORR; however, ORR was not significantly correlated with the interventional technique (TABE vs. DEB-TACE; P>0.05). The incidences of post-embolization syndrome (PES) and 48-h hepatotoxicity were significantly lower in the TABE group than the DEB-TACE group (both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in hepatotoxicity after 1 month (P>0.05). Conclusions: TABE is highly effective at managing hemorrhage from ruptured HCC. The initial therapeutic response of HCC to TABE is similar to that to DEB-TACE; however, TABE is associated with lower hepatotoxicity and fewer adverse effects, which paves the way for subsequent treatments and systemic therapies.