Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets

11Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. Material and Methods: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClip™, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni Twin™, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. Results: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in static friction when the three types of brackets were tested with the same wire size. The wire diameter influenced friction only when the brackets had a 10° angulation (p<0.05). The angulation influenced friction (p<0.05) when the brackets were associated with a 0.018" wire. Conclusion: Brackets with a modified slot design showed intermediate static frictional force values between the conventional and self-ligating brackets tested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castro, R. M., Smith Neto, P., Horta, M. C. R., Pithon, M. M., & Oliveira, D. D. (2013). Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 21(4), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free