Philosophy of punishment: Normative models and construction principles of legal systems

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper attempts to examine a philosophy of punishment in the normative perspective and to penetrate the structure of the fundamental premises and theses of retributivism. Punishment concepts are discussed in relation to two contexts and types of expressions formulated in the philosophy of punishment – normative and descriptive. The former are a matter of axiology and normative models, whereas the latter constitute a description of existing systems of criminal responsibility. The considerations are centred on a retributive model. The model of retributivism involves normative premises and consists in seeing these premises not as unconditionally binding directives, but as optimization rules, a kind of prima facie duty. These are mainly the quasi-legal duties of the state considered from the point of view of criminal policy. Retributivism can be seen as a set of norms (rules) for constructing legal system. The core of the paper consists in outlining such a concept. The inspiration for it was provided above all by the ideas of the Polish legal theory, R. Dworkin, W. D. Ross and R. Alexy, and modern retributivists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peno, M. (2019). Philosophy of punishment: Normative models and construction principles of legal systems. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu. Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Zagreb. https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.69.3.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free