Physical education among the suggestions: ¿the specifications in limbo?

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article aims to reflect on the paradigm of physical education from a critical perspective, in the first instance, it addresses the sciences that physical education has taken to be studied, in turn, analyzes the tensions affected from the theoretical discourse to the object of study in the training of future professionals in the field, it was also necessary on how the responsibility of finding the object of study is being assumed. As a result as practical applications, it can show that there are ambiguities to discover it, emphasizing the three approaches, which surround physical education, the natural, social or mixed sciences, on the other hand, it is argumentatively expressed that there is interest political versus investment in research that favors objectivity. Specificity is mentioned in a formative and scientific function so that later lines of research are generated that promote argumentative discourses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carballo, N. G., Pusch, N., & Polo, F. C. (2020). Physical education among the suggestions: ¿the specifications in limbo? Retos, (40), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47197/RETOS.V1I40.82431

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free