Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy as a Therapeutic Option for Patients with a Secondary Late-Stage Fibro-Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Therapy: A Pilot Study

12Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Secondary lymphedema (LE) can occur after breast cancer (BC) therapy with axillary lymph node surgery and/or radiotherapy. Reported incidence varies around 20%. The aim of this study was to see whether low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a therapeutic option in end-stage secondary upper limb fibro-LE. Methods and Results: A pilot study was performed on 10 adult patients who presented with an end-stage LE after BC treatment. They were all treated with usual physical therapy and all had lymphatic surgery before. Eight sessions of ESWT were applied, 2600 shocks at 0.1 mJ/mm2, 2/week during 4 weeks. Upper limb volume decreased nonsignificantly, from 3086.4 ± 539.47 to 2909.1 ± 471.60 mL. Mean circumference of the upper limb was significantly decreased from 32.3 ± 3.01 to 31.4 ± 2.71 cm at the height of the upper arm, from 29.1 ± 2.89 to 28.1 ± 2.71 cm at the height of the elbow, and from 27.5 ± 4.08 to 26.8 ± 3.75 cm at the height of the forearm. Subjective measurements by visual analog scale showed significant decrease in both hardness from 57.3 ± 15.84 to 24.4 ± 21.89 mm and subjective feeling of edema from 44.2 ± 16.90 to 23.2 ± 21.16 mm. No adverse features were reported. Conclusion: We added some evidence that low-energy ESWT is well supported and has additional benefits also in longstanding fibro-lipo-LE on swelling of the arm leading to more subjective comfort for the patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joos, E., Vultureanu, I., Nonneman, T., Adriaenssens, N., Hamdi, M., & Zeltzer, A. (2021). Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy as a Therapeutic Option for Patients with a Secondary Late-Stage Fibro-Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Therapy: A Pilot Study. Lymphatic Research and Biology, 19(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2020.0033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free