The role of primary repair for colonic injuries in wartime

40Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The study reviewed an experience of selective primary repair for penetrating colonic injuries incorporating a number of procedures during the 1992-1995 Bosnia-Herzegovina conflict. Methods: Of 5370 casualties, 259 (4.8 per cent) had injuries to the colon. The patients were divided into two groups: those who had primary repair and those who needed a colostomy. The patients' records were reviewed to determine the cause of injury (explosive weapons or bullets), the position and type of colon injury, associated injuries, the surgical procedure(s) done, complications related to the colonic wound or its management, and mortality. Results: Some 122 (47.1 percent) patients had primary colonic repair and 137 (52.9 per cent) had a colostomy. One hundred and fifty (57.9 per cent) were injured by explosive weapons, 108 (41.7 per cent) had bullet wounds and one (0.4 per cent) a stab injury. Associated injuries were seen in 249 (96.1 per cent) patients. Complications related to the colonic wound or its management developed in 27 per cent of patients after primary repair and 30 per cent after colostomy. Mortality rates were 8.2 per cent and 7.2 per cent, respectively. Conclusion: Primary repair was a safe and effective treatment for penetrating colonin injuries during war. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hudolin, T., & Hudolin, I. (2005, May). The role of primary repair for colonic injuries in wartime. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4915

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free