A comparison of discrete versus continuous environment in a variance components-base linkage analysis of the COGA data

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The information content of a continuous variable exceeds that of its categorical counterpart. The parameterization of a model may diminish the benefit of using a continuous variable. We explored the use of continuous versus discrete environment in variance components based analyses examining gene x environment interaction in the electrophysiological phenotypes from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. Results: The parameterization using the continuous environment produced a greater number of significant gene x environment interactions and lower AICs (Akaike's information criterion). In these cases, the genetic variance increased with increasing cigarette pack-years, the continuous environment of interest. This did not, however, result in enhanced LOD scores when linkage analyses incorporated the gene x continuous environment interaction. Conclusion: Alternative parameterizations may better represent the functional relationship between the continuous environment and the genetic variance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Viel, K. R., Warren, D. M., Buil, A., Dyer, T. D., Howard, T. E., & Almasy, L. (2005). A comparison of discrete versus continuous environment in a variance components-base linkage analysis of the COGA data. BMC Genetics, 6(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free