Multiplets of representations and Kostant's Dirac operator for equal rank loop groups

17Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Let $\mathfrak {g}$ be a semisimple Lie algebra, and let $\mathfrak {h}$ be a reductive subalgebra of maximal rank in $\mathfrak {g}$. Given any irreducible representation of $\mathfrak {g}$, consider its tensor product with the spin representation associated to the orthogonal complement of $ \mathfrak {h}$ in $\mathfrak {g}$. Recently, B. Gross, B. Kostant, P. Ramond, and S. Sternberg [2] proved a generalization of the Weyl character formula which decomposes the signed character of this product representation in terms of the characters of a set of irreducible representations of $\mathfrak {h}$, called a multiplet. Kostant [7] then constructed a formal $\mathfrak {h}$-equivariant Dirac operator on such product representations whose kernel is precisely the multiplet of $\mathfrak {h}$-representations corresponding to the given representation of $\mathfrak {g}$. We reproduce these results in the Kac-Moody setting for the extended loop algebras $\tilde {L} \mathfrak {g}$ and $\tilde {L}\mathfrak {h}$. We prove a homogeneous generalization of the Weyl-Kac character formula, which now yields a multiplet of irreducible positive energy representations of $L\mathfrak {h}$ associated to any irreducible positive energy representation of $L\mathfrak {g} $. We construct an $L\mathfrak {h}$-equivariant operator, analogous to Kostant's Dirac operator, on the tensor product of a representation of $L\mathfrak {g}$ with the spin representation associated to the complement of $L\mathfrak {h}$ in $L\mathfrak {g}$. We then prove that the kernel of this operator gives the $L\mathfrak {h}$-multiplet corresponding to the original representation of $L \mathfrak {g}$. © 2006 Duke University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Landweber, G. D. (2001). Multiplets of representations and Kostant’s Dirac operator for equal rank loop groups. Duke Mathematical Journal, 110(1), 121–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-01-11014-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free