“Coach’s eye”: psychological and tactical skills discriminate sporting potential of young soccer players

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Coaches’ subjective evaluations are predominantly responsible for talent identification and selection in soccer; therefore, systematizing the “coach’s eye” can optimize this process. Our objective was to compare tactical skills, perceived competence, and sport achievement orientation of young soccer players classified as having high or low sporting potential, according to their coaches’ opinion. 101 Brazilian U15 soccer players (14.6 ± 0.7 years; practice time: 7.6 ± 2.6 years) participated in the study. Questionnaires were used to assess their tactical knowledge (TACSIS – Tactical Skills Inventory for Sports), sport orientation (SOQ-Sport Orientation Questionnaire), and perceived competence. Compared with the low-potential soccer players (n = 57), the high-potential soccer players (n = 44) showed higher positioning and deciding skills (4.52 ± 0.73 vs. 4.18 ± 0.63; p = 0.02; d = 0.50), knowledge about others (4.25 ± 0.96 vs. 3.81 ± 0.83; p = 0.02; d = 0.49), and sum of tactical skills (4.43 ± 0.72 vs. 4.14 ± 0.65; p = 0.04; d = 0.46) In turn, high-potential athletes showed higher competitiveness (4.76 ± 0.27 vs. 4.55 ± 0.33; p = 0.01; d = 0.72) and greater perceived competence (7.79 ± 1.32 vs. 7.12 ± 1.13; p = 0.01; d = 0.54), respectively. We concluded that the U15 soccer players evaluated by their coaches as having high sporting potential presented better results in indicators of tactical skills, motivation, and perceived competence than their low-potential peers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vidigal, E. C., Silva, F. F., Rodrigues, T. L. A., Ribeiro Júnior, D. B., Matta, M. de O., de Barros, A. N., … Werneck, F. Z. (2022). “Coach’s eye”: psychological and tactical skills discriminate sporting potential of young soccer players. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2022v24e91439

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free