Is endoscopic ultrasonography essential for endoscopic resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors?

28Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM To evaluate the importance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for small (10 mm) rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) treatment. METHODS Patients in whom rectal NETs were diagnosed by endoscopic resection (ER) at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital between 2008 and 2014 were included in this study. A total of 120 small rectal NETs in 118 patients were included in this study. Histologic features and clinical outcomes were analyzed, and the findings of endoscopy, EUS and histology were compared. RESULTS The size measured by endoscopy was not significantly different from that measured by EUS and histology (r = 0.914 and r = 0.727 respectively). Accuracy for the depth of invasion was 92.5% with EUS. No patients showed invasion of the muscularis propria or metastasis to the regional lymph nodes. All rectal NETs were classified as grade 1 and demonstrated an L-cell phenotype. Mean follow-up duration was 407.54 ± 374.16 d. No patients had local or distant metastasis during the follow-up periods. CONCLUSION EUS is not essential for ER in the patient with small rectal NETs because of the prominent morphology and benign behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. B., Kim, D. J., Kim, H. W., Choi, C. W., Kang, D. H., Kim, S. J., & Nam, H. S. (2017). Is endoscopic ultrasonography essential for endoscopic resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors? World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23(11), 2037–2043. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i11.2037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free