Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: What shapes rule-following in a period of transition?

38Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The group engagement model has two core arguments. The first is that procedural justice shapes rule-following in groups, organisations and societies. The second is that the influence of procedural justice upon rule-following is mediated by changes in people's identification with groups. This study uses a sample of South Africans to test both arguments. While the procedural justice argument has already been widely tested and supported, this study extends that test to a society in rapid transition and upheaval. Further, it tests the identity mediation argument in the same context. The results support both arguments. Procedural justice shapes rule-following and that influence is mediated by identification with superordinate authority.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tyler, T. R. (2009). Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: What shapes rule-following in a period of transition? Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530802607639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free